| Publisher | Center for Art and Media in Karlsruhe | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Format | 148.1KB PDF | Date added | 09 May 2006 |
| Topics | Linux - Open Source, Linux Server OS | ||
| Downloads | 28 | ||
From the beginning of its development kernel 2.6 promised latency as low as a patched 2.4 kernel. These claims proved to be premature when testing of the 2.6.7 kernel showed it was much worse than 2.4. I present here a review of the most significant latency problems discovered and solved by the kernel developers with the input of the Linux audio community between the beginning of this informal collaboration in July 2004 around kernel 2.6.7 through the most recent development release, 2.6.16-rc5. Most of these solutions went into the mainline kernel directly or via the -mm, voluntary-preempt, realtime-preempt, and -rt patch sets maintained by Ingo Molnar (Molnar, 2004) and many others.
Did you find this white paper useful?
13 out of 22 users found this white paper useful
Related white papers
The Evolution of Integration
Once upon a time life and information systems were simple. Then one day somebody let Pandora out of her box. Someone said -can't we add new requirements to these systems?...
The Role of Open Source Data Integration
This free-to-download whitepaper looks at how Enterprise customers are demanding project]sized data integration tools that can be scaled up to enterprise use. They donft want complex, expensive DI products that...
Software Firm Quickly Builds Competitive Public Sector Portal Solution
Many municipal and regional governments lack the resources needed to build and maintain e-government portals. To help these organizations, Microsoft Gold Certified Partner Spenta Consulting built the Citizen Service Platform...
Newell Rubbermaid Expects to Save $1.5 Million Managing Brand Web Sites Over Two Years
Newell Rubbermaid wanted a common and cost-effective way to manage its more than 30 brand Web sites, while giving each of those sites the distinctive look and function that the...
Red Hat Enterprise Linux beats Microsoft Windows Server 2008 in value, cost
Evaluate the savings, performance, and overall value of a Red Hat Enterprise Linux deployment versus a Microsoft Windows Server 2008 deployment. In this whitepaper, the two systems are compared over...
Red Hat Enterprise Linux leads the way with web applications
Independent tests performed under industry benchmark standards find that Red Hat Enterprise Linux is the leading platform for running web servers--as well as Java applications and other large-scale online transaction...
Red Hat Open Source Security
No software is perfecteven the most rigorously tested and secured operating system or application will contain flaws and vulnerabilities. Open source technology gives administrators control over their infrastructure in a...
